“Mickey 17” stars Robert Pattinson, Naomi Ackie, Steven Yeun, Toni Collette, and Mark Ruffalo. Released on March 7, 2025, the film has a disposable employee sent to colonize an ice-filled planet. The film is written and directed by Bong Joon-ho, who also directed films such as “Memories of Murder”, “Snowpiercer”, “Okja”, and “Parasite”. It is based on the 2022 novel Mickey7 by Edward Ashton. Having a job can have benefits, including getting paid weekly, but it’s not without the possible casualties that come from it. If you’re not careful, it could be the last job you’ll ever applied. That may be the case when you register yourself as an “expendable”, mainly the casualty part, but this particular assignment just removed that aspect from the equation…by cloning. This defines the latest cinematic endeavor from Bong Joon-ho after his Oscar dominance with the black comedy masterpiece “Parasite” back in 2019. However, unlike “Parasite”, this film takes Bong Joon-ho’s thematic capabilities to the far reaches of space, where one unfortunate employee gets a position that’s to die for, and I don’t mean that in a figurative sense. With that said, let’s see if this offbeat sci-fi comedy is a job worth applying for. The story centers on Mickey Barnes (Pattinson), a financially destitute man on the run from a loan shark following a failed business venture. Unable to pay his debts, Mickey and his childhood friend, Timo (Yeun), decide to sign up as crew members for a spaceship departing Earth to colonize the snow planet Nilfheim. Mickey is then hired as an “expendable”, a disposable clone worker assigned to take on lethal assignments. Whenever Mickey dies during a mission, the colony regenerates a new body to repeat the process. However, one of his clones, “Mickey 17”, is inaccurately presumed dead and prematurely replaced. After confronting his replacement, Mickey 18, the clones are then faced with execution for breaking the colony’s rule. This puts the clones face to face with the colony’s oppressive leaders, including the egomaniacal politician Kenneth Marshall (Ruffalo). Despite my inexperience with the source material, “Mickey 17” was one of my anticipated films of the year for several reasons, with one being Bong Joon-ho’s involvement. The director’s thematic and offbeat vision has caught my attention since watching “Snowpiercer” and “Okja”. However, it was his Best Picture winner “Parasite” that made me more eager to see more of his works, as that film offered a thematically layered and oddly irresistible portrayal of social inequality and wealth disparity. It even made me check out his other masterpiece, “The Host”, a while back, and it was understandably a unique take on the usual monster horror formula. When I found that Bong Joon-ho was directing “Mickey 17”, my interest was immediately piqued since he’s known for juggling multilayered social themes with entertainment values. So, I had high hopes that he would deliver something grand with this seemingly quirky concept, which he did upon viewing it. While a far cry from the impactful narrative force that was “Parasite”, “Mickey 17” is a delightfully offbeat and visually appealing piece of sci-fi entertainment that offers plenty to say amid its cloning shenanigans. On paper, the film seems like a traditional science fiction comedy that relies on dark humor involving the protagonist getting killed in multiple ways. While that may be the case, it instead uses this concept to explore work inequality and the values of life, in which Mickey is treated as a disposable lab rat by the higher-ups, making him question the aspect of death and the values of being an “expendable”. That is until he confronts a much bigger scenario involving the planet’s wormy inhabitants, forcing him to become more human than a throwaway tool. This is part of the social and class themes that made Bong Joon-ho a household name, and it’s unsurprising that these topics are present in “Mickey 17”. Regarding Bong’s screenplay, though, it didn’t exactly hit all of the notes needed to significantly influence its political and working-class topics. That includes its less-than-stellar third act and the hit-and-miss developing relationship between the two Mickeys. Thankfully, that didn’t stop me from admiring the script for favoring its exploration of these subjects while injecting some outlandish fun with its bleak concept. However, if you’re going into it expecting a collection of grisly yet amusing deaths similar to “The Monkey”, you might be disappointed with the result since they’re mostly done offscreen. But this is one occasion where a dark comedy involving death can be entertaining without seeing Robert Pattinson get killed off in gruesome ways. While that could be more fun that way, it’s also concerning that it would undermine the film’s thematic undertones, so I’m happy it stuck with this approach. In addition to his screenplay, Bong Joon-ho proved once again that he’s the right person for the job regarding his direction. While his portrayal of the social and class topics is worth recognizing, Bong’s handling of the tonal shifts and long-shot presentation stands out as a thing of cinematic beauty. Dark comedy can be a tricky sell since it explores some of the mature themes in an amusing yet uncomfortable light, but Bong Joon-ho is one of the filmmakers that made this genre work based on my experience with “Parasite”. It’s occasionally unnerving, but it also has a specific charm to its dark quirkiness that makes a film an absurdly unhinged experience. “Mickey 17” happens to fit that criteria, providing some suitable laughs through its charismatic and slapstick appeal. More importantly, it’s a well-directed and gorgeously shot movie that benefited from Bong’s collaborators: cinematographer Darius Khondji, who worked on “Okja”, and editor Yang Jin-mo, who edited “Okja” and “Parasite”. I would also commend the visual effects team for portraying the isolated and icy Nilfheim and its native inhabitants, which they dubbed “creepers”, without being an eyesore through its laziness. Finally, we have the film’s cast, who all did very well keeping up with its tonal shifts through their performances. However, the one actor that stood out the most was Robert Pattinson in his dual performance as the Mickey clones. Seriously, is there anything that Pattinson couldn’t accomplish? I know I have been saying this a lot since he departed from the “Twilight” franchise, but it still bears repeating that Robert Pattinson is another example of masterclass acting. Instead of being his usual self, Pattinson channeled his vocal range to become two distinct people, the timid yet kind-hearted Mickey 17 and the ruthless Mickey 18. The result was a dual performance worthy of standing alongside Theo James’ double role in “The Monkey”. Naomi Ackie and Steven Yeun also delivered decent performances as Nasha Barridge, Mickey’s love interest, and Timo, respectively. As for Mark Ruffalo, he once again showcased that he’s the best at playing narcissistic assholes regarding his role as Kenneth Marshall, a self-centered, tyrannical politician with secret plans for Nilfheim. It’s nice to see Ruffalo still making a name for himself outside his MCU role as a green-skinned, rampaging monster. Overall, “Mickey 17” is an absurdly entertaining and visually impressive social examination worth dying for. While it fumbled a bit near the finish line regarding its thematic impact and screenplay, the film is a well-crafted and thematically engaging portrayal of work inequality that emphasizes Bong Joon-ho’s impeccable tonal shifts and cinematic finesse. Robert Pattinson delivered another incredible performance as the multiple Mickeys and Bong Joon-ho’s direction offered a refreshingly surreal approach to its darkly comical concept through its cinematography, editing, and visual effects. I still think “Parasite” is better regarding the director’s script and thematic influence, but “Mickey 17” proves that Bong Joon-ho’s presence in the film industry won’t die off anytime soon. It's worth checking out for those who enjoyed his previous works like “Parasite” and “The Host”, but don’t expect it to be on the same narrative levels as those two films. B+
0 Comments
“My Dead Friend Zoe” stars Sonequa Martin-Green, Natalie Morales, Gloria Reuben, Utkarsh Ambudkar, Morgan Freeman, and Ed Harris. Released on February 28, 2025, the film has a war veteran struggling to adapt due to her relationship with her dead friend. The film featured the feature directorial debut of Kyle Hausmann-Stokes, who served in the U.S. Army during the Iraq War and directed the 2011 documentary, “Now After…”. It is based on Hausmann-Stokes’ 2022 short film, “Merit x Zoe”. We all have different ways of expressing grief after volunteering to serve in the U.S. Army. Most people express it through uncontrollable emotions, while others convey it using a different method. For this particular veteran, she holds on to it through her friend only she can see. I guess we’re never too old to have an imaginary friend by our side, even if it’s one who was once alive. This defines the latest movie that sees a director revisiting the topic from their source material in a feature film format. I’ve recently seen one involving a miracle amid a diving incident, so what’s stopping me from watching another? Does it heal me regarding its cinematic and often humorous reflection of grief, or is it better off dead? Let’s find out. The story follows Merit (Martin-Green), a U.S. Army Afghanistan veteran who recently departed from her duty. Her only companion keeping her company is Zoe (Morales), her best friend from the Army, whom only Merit can see. However, her obsession with her dead best friend keeps Merit from adapting back to normalcy, causing concern from those around her, including her VA group counselor, Dr. Cole (Freeman), and her strict mother, Kris (Reuben). That is until Merit’s estranged grandfather, a retired Vietnam veteran, Dale (Harris), starts to lose his way. This puts Merit in an internal struggle to overcome her grief and reunite her divided family. It’s very uncommon that the final weekend of February lacked any exciting choices to see in the theater. This year seemed no different despite some of them receiving decent reviews. However, out of this weekend’s slate of releases, “My Dead Friend Zoe” just happened to intrigue me the most. Besides the strong early reviews and some recognizable actors like Morgan Freeman, my interest in this film is due to my fascination with war movies, especially ones involving grief and PTSD following the veterans’ service. Some films involving the aftermath of war, including 2017’s “Thank You for Your Service”, have proven that the readjustment to normalcy can be as emotionally challenging as surviving in the war zone. If properly executed, they can send audiences into an emotional roller coaster that convinces audiences to be aware of mental illness. “My Dead Friend Zoe” was tasked with creating that familiar experience without being too sentimentally manipulative or even insulting to the topics. After watching it, I found myself surprised to see that it completed this task with flying colors. While it may appear to be a melodrama you’d typically see on the Hallmark channel, “My Dead Friend Zoe” successfully avoided this pitfall by investing effort in its narrative quality and thematic depth. Because of this, the film became a genuinely light-hearted and satisfyingly thoughtful drama that provokes as many chuckles as it does in tears. With the film being classified as a comedy-drama, “My Dead Friend Zoe” had a pretty tricky objective of displaying its serious topics light-heartedly without insulting them with its humor. This is another film that explores PTSD and grief, particularly among veterans who returned from their service to adjust to civilian life. In Merit’s case, her grief comes from imagining her late friend Zoe as if she were still with her. However, as the film progresses toward its third act, it showcases that there’s more to these invisible wounds than what I was led to believe. That sequence made me see this post-war journey differently, especially regarding Merit’s friendship with Zoe and its themes of guilt and forgiveness. It not only surrounded this “ordinary” friendship with genuine depth and humanity, but it also manifested the emotional core that’s more sincere and honest than manipulatively corny. Of course, when combined with its humor, it could risk being tone-deaf in its themes if the balance isn’t properly in check. Fortunately, “My Dead Friend Zoe” avoided that risk entirely due to Hausmann-Stokes’ commitment as a director. It’s easy to see that this is a film he wanted to make because it was inspired by Hausmann-Stokes’ time in Iraq as a paratrooper and convoy commander. I may not be in the same shoes as him, but I can tell he’s using that experience as a veteran to manifest his perspective and feelings about the situation through filmmaking. Hausmann-Stokes ensured that the message was loud and clear without shoving it down my throat while injecting the healing process with a lighter and charismatic touch, with much of the humor coming from the genuine human connection, including the chemistry between Merit and Zoe. As a result, Kyle Hausmann-Stokes expressed an authentic and emotionally compelling experience that reflects the ups and downs of the path of healing while displaying himself as a respectable filmmaker. The screenplay by Hausmann-Stokes and A. J. Bermudez was also strong in expressing its commentary and the storytelling in a humane manner, especially the surprising third act. I would also credit Ali Greer’s editing for its snappy transitions without making it look too choppy and maintaining its consistency in the pacing. In addition to the directing and writing, the movie strongly benefited from its superb cast, including Sonequa Martin-Green as Merit. Martin-Green has had plenty of decent credits under her belt, including “Star Trek: Discovery”, “The Walking Dead”, and “New Girl”. In terms of her movie roles, however, I’ve only known her as LeBron James’ wife in the “Space Jam” sequel nobody gave a rabbit’s foot about. Her involvement in “My Dead Friend Zoe” allowed her to impress me in her starring role, and boy, did she impress me a lot. With just the right amount of humanity and vulnerability injected into Merit’s internal struggle to heal, Sonequa Martin-Green provided a fantastic performance that’s heartfelt and even heartbreaking. Natalie Morales was also great in conveying humor and heartache into Zoe’s seemingly arrogant personality, enhancing the irresistible chemistry between the war friends. Morgan Freeman also had plenty of solid moments as Merit’s group counselor despite his role being smaller than most. However, it did make me wish that Freeman was my therapist. Finally, we have Ed Harris, who’s just as superb as he’s always been regarding his miraculous performance as Dale. Overall, “My Dead Friend Zoe” avoids being dead in the water by delivering an emotionally thought-provoking and genuinely profound journey of self-healing and post-war grief. At first glance, this would’ve been another forgettable melodrama where its manipulative emotions overshadow its themes and call to action regarding mental illness. However, I’m surprised that this wasn’t the case, as it successfully invokes the lighter side of its challenging and thoughtful topics without drowning their intended purpose with its schmaltzy insecurity. The fact that it’s a smartly written and respectfully directed comedy-drama serves as a nice bonus, along with a cast that has fun with their roles while expressing their brilliance through their talents. This might be another film that might get overlooked after a few weeks, but if you get the opportunity and it’s playing near your area, I recommend you check this one out, especially if you’re a veteran. A"Last Breath" stars Woody Harrelson, Simu Liu, Finn Cole, Cliff Curtis, and Mark Bonnar. Releasing on February 28, 2025, the film has a deep-sea diving crew rescuing their member from the ocean's depths. The film is directed by Alex Parkinson, who also directed the 2021 television movie "Lucy, the Human Chimp" and several television shows like "Fake or Fortune", "Primal Survivor", and "River Monsters". It is a remake of the 2019 documentary film directed by Parkinson and Richard da Costa. Being a deep-sea diver has its perks, like exploring the deepest depths of the ocean, but like most jobs, it also isn't without its share of dangers that come with this position. One of them was portrayed in Alex Parkinson's documentary, which depicted a saturation diving accident in 2012 that left one of the divers stranded with no heat, oxygen, or light at their disposal. While it thankfully didn't end in tragedy, it became one of the stories that leave us with a sense of determination and hope amid unexpected and troubling times. Not only that, but it also reminds us of one of the occasions that could go wrong upon taking this job. Six years after the documentary, Alex Parkinson returns to retell this similar story in a cinematic format that might leave audiences gasping for air. Does it have enough suspense to accomplish the impossible, or are we better off staying away from the water? Let's find out. The story chronicles a team of seasoned deep-sea divers consisting of Duncan Allock (Harrelson), Dave Yuasa (Liu), and Chris Lemons (Cole). Aboard their support vessel, the crew is tasked with carrying out repairs 100 meters below the surface of the North Sea. However, during the repairs, the vessel's dynamic positioning system failed, causing the ship to drift and the umbilical tether holding Lemons to snap. As a result, Lemons is left stranded at the bottom of the ocean with no heat and light accompanying him and only a few minutes of breathable gas left in his tanks. This puts Duncan, David, and the remaining crew in a race against the clock to rescue Chris from the ocean's darkest depths. Out of this weekend's weak but well-received selection of movies, "Last Breath" was the one that caught my attention the most. The cast is one reason for my interest, especially Simu Liu, who continues to find ways to draw in a crowd outside of "Shang-Chi" and "Barbie". However, it was also the concept that made me willing to check the film out. "Last Breath" was my first exposure to the incident that almost ended in an underwater demise over a decade ago. In fact, I didn't even realize that there was a documentary about it until I did some research on the movie. While this true story offers another reason why I would never become a deep sea diver, it does intrigue me enough to watch the tale unfold, especially since I can't say no to a cinematic rescue mission. Regarding the narrative, "Last Breath" is another survival thriller that utilizes its fact-based story to represent the tale of resilience and miracles amid an unexpected incident. Amid its 93-minute runtime, the movie depicts a group of divers who brave the obstacles to rescue their member from the ocean's depths and freezing temperatures. Everybody loves an old-fashioned plot that gets their hearts pounding with anticipation and fear and provides hope through the characters' persistence against all odds. But, of course, it all comes down to the movie's execution and whether it's worthy of bringing this intense incident to the big screen. As it turns out, "Last Breath" is undoubtedly a fact-based film that'll make audiences believe in miracles. However, it somehow lacks the consistent emotion of its storytelling to rise above its formulaic surface. Film adaptations of documentaries are nothing new, as they use their cinematic finesses to reshape their real-life tales for audiences who don't feel like watching a series of interviews for a hundred minutes straight. But, I rarely see a filmmaker behind the documentary return to direct a film version of the topic they previously explored. Of course, I am talking about Alex Parkinson, a television director who revisited this incident previously told in his 2019 documentary. I haven't watched the documentary, so I can't compare the two in terms of direction. However, I will say that Parkinson didn't do too bad for his feature film debut. Utilizing his knowledge and vision from his documentary, Parkinson instilled a sense of tension and anxiety into the scenario that's engrossing enough to grab my attention. More importantly, he understood the fundamentals and even the risks associated with deep-sea diving, mainly from the darkness and loneliness that came from the bottom of the ocean. They call it the most dangerous job in the world for a reason. The underwater cinematography also effectively captured the vast emptiness and blackness of the ocean's bottom. So, you can say that Alex Parkinson had the proper capabilities to explore the harrowing dangers of being a deep-sea diver. Unfortunately, as a filmmaker, his vision didn't offer much else that we haven't seen in other fact-based movies, including ones from the survival genre. Parkinson's approach to the film's tension was serviceable in maintaining my attention, but his storytelling struggled to provide much genuine sentimentality in its plot and characters to warrant most of the suspense presented. This is due to its screenplay by Parkinson, Mitchell LaFortune, and David Brooks, which relied on its genre tropes to send itself drifting on autopilot, especially regarding its character depth. The movie's short runtime was fitting for its straightforward plot, but at the same time, it also didn't leave much room for further exploration of its characters, including David's growing relationship with Chris. It has some character moments that attempt to invoke emotion, but they fall short in combining it with its exciting suspense. Its concept can be a heart-pounding and frighteningly fun experience for moviegoers. Sadly, Parkinson didn't quite have the proper mixture of survival thrills and character-driven narrative to make it more special than it should be. In addition to its entertaining tension and underwater sequences, "Last Breath" benefitted from its decent cast, mainly the three main actors. Despite the movie's tight yet mildly underwhelming script, the trio made the best of their talents to inject likability and charisma into the deep-sea diving crew. Woody Harrelson has always been one of the actors who can instantly deliver an approachable aura in his performances, no matter which character he plays, which is one of the reasons for my interest in "Last Breath". Unsurprisingly, Harrelson's performance as Duncan is no exception, as he conveyed a friendly presence in the aging diver, but also isn't without his dramatic chops backing him up. Simu Liu goes for a more serious approach to his role of David compared to his previous roles, and the result is another diverting performance from the "Convenience" and "Shang-Chi" actor. Finn Cole also did a pretty good job portraying Chris Lemons, the diver left stranded at the bottom of the ocean, which is nice considering his mixed filmography so far, including his role as the young Jakob Toretto in "F9". Overall, "Last Breath" may not leave everyone breathless, but it has enough promising merits to make this rescue mission a diverting fact-based excursion. Its tight yet formulaic storytelling may be fitting for its short runtime, but it also doesn't offer much in the tank to explore this risky endeavor and the movie's characters on an emotional level. However, for those needing a short and straightforward drama thriller, the film delivered the necessary amount of oxygen to avoid drowning in the sea of familiar survival movies. The main cast was undoubtedly decent in their performances, and Parkinson's approach to the film's tension and underwater sequences was serviceable for its entertainment values and suspense. It's nothing too special regarding the survival thriller genre. However, I was mostly pleased with how enjoyable it was, even though it doesn't do its true story justice with its cinematic essence. C+"Ne Zha 2" stars Lü Yanting, Joseph Cao, Han Mo, Lü Qi, Zhang Jiaming, Wang Deshun, Yu Chen, Li Nan, Zhou Yongxi, and Yang Wei. Released in China on January 29, 2025, the film has Nezha and Ao Bing traveling to reclaim their bodies following a catastrophe. The film was written and directed by Jiaozi (Yang Yu), who's known for directing the short films "See Through" and "The Boss's Woman". It is a sequel to Jiaozi's 2019 film "Ne Zha", loosely based on the novel Investiture of the Gods by Xu Zhonglin. If there's one of the things I enjoy about animation, it's that it creates an influence on a global scale. Many animated features in America have their share of greatness in their storytelling and presentations, but the ones made in other countries are different stories altogether. That is if the proper effort is put into them. Not all animated films from various countries stick the landing, but when they do, they can be something worth mentioning when it comes to animation. Japan is the primary example due to the masterpieces from Studio Ghibli and Hayao Miyazaki, but that changed in 2019 when Chinese filmmaker Jiaozi made history with his first animation debut in his home country: a loose adaptation of China's mythological history involving demons and spirits. For those who don't know, "Ne Zha" is an animated fantasy adventure film depicting the tale of a young, unruly boy who's reincarnated from the cursed Demon Orb. The boy, destined to destroy the world and die from its curse, fights to change his fate while uncovering a sinister plot from a mischievous god and an army of dragons. Despite being Jiaozi's feature debut and the first animated film produced by a new studio, "Ne Zha" defied expectations to become one of the biggest commercial successes in China. Combined with state-of-the-art CGI animation and a story that combines action, humor, and heart, the film became a staple of big things to come for Jiaozi and animation studio Chengdu Coco Cartoon, as well as the start of the Fengshen Cinematic Universe. This franchise continued with a spin-off involving another popular Chinese figure, Jiang Ziya, in 2020, but we haven't seen Nezha return to the big screen until now. Last month saw the release of the long-awaited sequel to "Ne Zha", which broke even more box office records than expected, including becoming the highest-grossing animated film of all time and the highest-grossing film in a single country, China, surpassing "The Force Awakens". With the film now released in America, I figured I would take the time to see if this sequel is good enough to achieve such surprising results, especially since I recently watched its predecessor. With that said, let's travel back to this world of demons and immortals and see if this animated follow-up is worth the six-year wait. The story takes place immediately after the events of "Ne Zha". Nezha (Yanting), a young boy born with the Demon Orb, and his friend Ao Bing (Mo) were struck by the heavenly lightning together, destroying their physical bodies. Even though they survived by becoming spirits, their souls are still in danger of being dissipated, so Nezha's mentor, Taiyi Zhenren (Jiaming), attempts to reshape their bodies with his Sacred Lotus. Unfortunately, Ao Bing's new body was destroyed after defending Chentang Pass from his father, the Dragon King of the East Sea, Ao Guang (Nan), and Taiyi's brother, Shen Gongbao (Wei), as an act of revenge. As part of a ceasefire deal, Ao Bing and Nezha would have to share Nezha's body for seven days. To create a new body for Ao Bing, the two friends and Taiyi embark on a quest to complete the three trials created by Master Xian Wuliang (Deshun) to win a mystical potion. As mentioned earlier, I watched "Ne Zha" for free on YouTube out of curiosity, and I was surprised to see how good it was. Besides the English dub being iffy regarding the vocal performances, "Ne Zha" was a remarkable display of CGI animation that emphasized its epic set pieces and action on a grander scale amid its straightforward yet engrossing plot involving fate. Would I consider it another animated masterpiece? Maybe. But it did get me curious about the future that lies ahead for China's animated franchise. Unfortunately, I didn't check out the Jiang Ziya spin-off, which is set in the same universe as "Ne Zha", but don't worry. I will check it out eventually. Because of this experience, I was in a good position to check out the sequel, which was playing at my favorite cinema, especially since I had heard a lot of chatter about its record-breaking box office run. At this rate, it could end up being the first animated movie to earn over $2 billion worldwide, serving as a huge wake-up call to the animation studios in America to step up their animation game. It certainly has that type of popularity from its predecessor to make this much money, but is the quality also good enough to warrant that success? Absolutely! "Ne Zha 2" utilized everything that made its predecessor a success to create a bigger, bolder, and more fiery continuation that possesses its incredible sense of vibrancy and heart. One of those factors was the story, which continues Nezha's journey of forming his own destiny. Both movies share a common theme of fate and what we make of it, not what others believe we should do. While Nezha does have the makings of a demon regarding his attitude and powers, he strives to seek acceptance from others and embark on his own path. Instead of repeating the narrative beats as its predecessor, "Ne Zha 2" explores Nezha's growth further as he becomes the protector of his hometown. While I won't give too much away, I will say that Jiaozi had put plenty of effort into making his protagonist likable through his coming-of-age journey amid his short-tempered persona, especially during the third act, which actually got me tearing up a bit. The result is a sequel that felt bigger in its cinematic scale, themes, and character moments. It can be a bit much with its shockingly long runtime of two hours and 24 minutes, but its swift pacing helped keep the wacky and stylized rhythm going without missing out on its sentimental beats. In addition to his well-written screenplay, Jiaozi also continued to be a surprisingly impressive director in the animation department. Jiaozi faced many challenges while making his first animation feature as a director, including choosing the proper balance of style, narrative flow, and framework. Directing an animated film may not be easy, but it can be rewarding if the right effort is put into impressing all types of audiences. Despite his inexperience, Jiaozi managed to defy the odds by transforming "Ne Zha" into an immersive and consistently diverting phenomenon. "Ne Zha 2" clearly signifies that Jiaozi has found his groove with his vision by relying on the elements that worked in the first film while improving them without making it feel too bloated. One of these was the stunning action choreography, which combines stylized energy and vibrancy with wide-angle cinematography, similar to the first film. The other was the slapstick humor, which may seem dumb at first but was actually humorous for older audiences like me. Plus, it's surprisingly well-balanced with the drama and some of its dark moments, including the second half. These elements showed how confident Jiaozi is in directing animation, as he focuses more on providing a worthy story for its presentation than treating it like a cartoon for kids. While it does have something for the younglings to enjoy, including the slapstick comedy, Jiaozi ensured that the film also had something for the adults to appreciate. The cast for the Chinese dub reprised their roles from the first film, including Yanting as the title character and Mo as Ao Bing. Unlike my experience with "Ne Zha", I was able to watch the sequel in its original Chinese dub, so this was my first time reviewing the cast's vocal performances through its original version. All I can say is that this was a better experience than its predecessor's wonky English dub. Lü Yanting continues to deliver the fire and occasional charm in his performance as Nezha, while Han Mo delivered plenty of decent moments as Ao Bing. Taiyi Zhenren is one of the characters whose comedic chops can be hit or miss in terms of direction. However, the first film proved him to be surprisingly funny through his annoyance, clumsiness, and cartoony appeal, mainly due to Zhang Jiaming's amusing voice performance. The sequel sees Taiyi as his usual self, like its predecessor, and it's all the better for it. Finally, we have the animation, which I've been eager to see what it has in store for the sequel. Unsurprisingly, it managed to meet my high expectations. This is China's most expensive animated film to date, surpassing "Deep Sea", with the budget being 600 million yuan or $80 million in American terms. It may not seem as much from the perspective of the United States since it's around the same budget as an Illumination movie, but it's a huge deal in China. Thankfully, it was money well spent, as the animation plays a significant role in the film's massive scale. The immense fluidity of the characters' movements matched gracefully with the film's detailed and immersive environments and the thrilling action set pieces, providing a visual grandeur reminiscent of such epics as "Lord of the Rings". Think of it as "Kung Fu Panda", but with more epicness in its vibrant appearance and color palettes. Even the paint-like animation during specific sequences looked absolutely astounding. It is an example of modern CGI animation done right regarding the liveliness and scope of its cinematography and appearance. Overall, "Ne Zha 2" is a blazingly stunning and consistently engrossing follow-up that further earns its flames within the animation industry. Its beefy runtime can be a mild concern for some people, especially those with kids with short attention spans, but I don't seem to mind it at all. I was constantly engaged from start to finish, and it's not just because of its presentation and action. It's also because of its worthy story that successfully expands the world, characters, and themes formed by its predecessor while providing a couple of surprisingly sentimental moments to boot. With its enjoyable voice cast, Jiaozi's direction and screenplay, exciting action set pieces, and incredible animation, the film marks an early contender for my favorite animated feature of 2025. However, that could change as we progress through the year. It's pretty amazing to see Jiaozi come this far despite his rough beginnings, especially in the animation department. It goes to show that those who don't give up on forging their own path can make a huge difference. With two successful animated films under his belt, it seems like Jiaozi may have found his niche in animation storytelling. It's enough to get me intrigued for his next feature, like a potential "Ne Zha 3" or maybe something more original. We shall see. Until then, I would gladly recommend it to those who loved the first film. A"The Unbreakable Boy" stars Zachary Levi, Meghann Fahy, Jacob Laval, Drew Powell, and Patricia Heaton. Released on February 21, 2025, the film has a father overcoming challenges while raising his autistic son. The film was written and directed by Jon Gunn, who also directed films such as "Mercy Street", "Do You Believe?", "The Case for Christ", and "Ordinary Angels". It is based on the book by Scott Michael LeRette and Susy Flory. Life can be pretty iffy with all the negativity and cruelty dominating the world recently. But, when push comes to shove, all it usually takes to overshadow the world's awfulness is an act of kindness and determination when things get too tough. This has been the case for every scenario, especially in media like films and television, and we can all agree that that will not change anytime soon. This month has further proved this inspiration with "Paddington in Peru", featuring a well-polite bear spreading positivity worldwide. Now, we have another cinematic portrayal of hope seeking to give us the warmth and good nature we all deserve amid the modern blockbusters courtesy of Jon Gunn and the Erwin Brothers. But do all these good intentions make for a worthy cinematic experience or an example of mawkish, sentimental manipulation? Let's find out. The movie is based on the true story of the LeRette family. Austin (Laval) is on the autism spectrum and is also diagnosed with Osteogenesis Imperfecta, resulting in bones that break easily. As he navigates life through his school, Austin's father, Scott (Levi), strives to become the best dad he can be in dealing with Austin's condition. Along with his wife, Teresa (Fahy), and second son, Logan (Gavin Warren), Scott and Austin overcome life's biggest challenges to show the world they're both unbreakable. This was another film from the Erwin Brothers that went through release date hell following "White Bird". It was only three years ago when I first caught word of "The Unbreakable Boy", which seemed to be up my alley due to its concept. However, its constant last-minute delays made me feel less confident about its final product. Considering that "White Bird" suffered from this similar issue and only turned out to be…just fine, it's understandable why I should be worried about this film. Regardless, I was willing to give it a try since it's another movie that deals with autism. As someone who's also on the autism spectrum, I was pleased to see more of this representation onscreen, even though some of the concepts are less faithful to the disability than others. But what really matters is whether this cinematic reflection of inspiration would break people's low expectations. After watching it at an early screening, I found that answer, but it wasn't what I had hoped for. "The Unbreakable Boy" featured plenty of charming and heartfelt moments that would make many people tear up. However, it's also a straightforward, middling, and misleading family film that struggled to effectively tug at all the heartstrings. You might be wondering why I believe this movie is "misleading". Well, it's because of how the final product was presented compared to its marketing. While "The Unbreakable Boy" does center on Austin, its actual main focus is his father, Scott, who struggles with his own problems while taking care of his autistic son and maintaining his relationship with Teresa. One of which is his substance abuse, in which he drinks…a lot. That's right. A PG-rated movie that seems to be targeting young kids through its trailers is actually about a father struggling with addiction. I can already imagine someone saying, "Hey, kids! Do you want to watch a movie about an alcoholic father?" But, on a serious note, it made sense why this movie went down this route. The plot involving the dad and even Austin's condition was supposed to resemble that life is full of broken stuff. Some can be broken for bad reasons, such as addiction ruining someone's relationship, but they can easily be mended if you add kindness and hope into the mix. In this case, Austin's tenderheartedness helps Scott see the world the same way his son sees it to redeem himself from his mistakes. So, while this thematic material may be a bit much for younger kids, it's also relatable to those who embarked on that similar path or still are. On the other hand, it's also disappointing that the film didn't focus on Austin as much as Scott, especially with his struggles with autism and sensitive bones. That would've been an excellent opportunity to inspire people who are also on the spectrum, including me, to brave through life's difficult challenges and embrace who they are regardless of their disabilities. Instead, it decided to keep things "family-friendly" by focusing on Scott's alcoholism. It also didn't help that Jon Gunn's screenplay was on cruise control in its formula taken from other films with similar topics, even with its good intentions. It didn't add much surprising depth to its storytelling, and a couple of moments weren't explored a lot or frustrated me by the characters' actions. But, as far as everything else goes, Gunn's heart was in the right place regarding his direction. If you're familiar with Gunn's filmography, he tends to provide a sentimental and charismatic touch in his fact-based stories, especially last year's "Ordinary Angels", which I surprisingly liked. Whether it works for everyone or not, I appreciate what he's attempting to accomplish in his movies. While I can at least say the same for "The Unbreakable Boy", Gunn's approach to its sentimentality surprisingly fell short of those intentions. "Ordinary Angels" had that similar essence, leaving me tearing up because it was earned in a genuine sense. "The Unbreakable Boy" did leave me smiling, but its emotional core didn't feel earned due to how dry some sentimental moments were. Fortunately, his ability to inject irresistible charm and goodwill into its tone didn't break as easily as its narrative cliches. Part of the film's charm is due to its cast, who did a good enough job with their performances, including Zachary Levi, who returns to the world of Erwin Brothers drama as Scott LeRette. I can still understand that Levi has "problems" behind the scenes, but as an actor, he can still deliver the appeal even if the final product isn't great. His performance as Scott is no exception, with him manifesting the father's internal struggle through his respectable talent. Was it an award-worthy performance? Not really, but I will say that it was a well-deserved improvement over his role as Harold in "Harold and the Purple Crayon". Meghann Fahy was also decent as Teresa, the wife with brittle bone disease like Austin, and Drew Powell was a serviceable comic relief as Joe, Scott's friend. I would also credit Jacob Laval for providing plenty of heart and humor in his role of Austin, especially when he's narrating the movie's events. With how enjoyable Laval was in the film, it made the lack of focus on him a bit more disappointing. Overall, "The Unbreakable Boy" is a tried-and-true fact-based drama that doesn't break new ground in its genre formula despite some good intentions in its charm and messages. With Jon Gunn and the Erwin Brothers in charge, the film delivered exactly what people would expect from it regarding its tone, relatable themes, and good old-fashioned moments of inspiration. However, regarding its storytelling, the movie doesn't offer anything besides those elements to convince those outside its target audience to open their hearts to its flawed sentimentality. The cast was enjoyable in their roles, including Levi and Laval, and its messages about kindness and life were endearing. But, its average screenplay, cliches, and Gunn's hit-and-miss direction involving its mildly mawkish emotion make this family-friendly drama more breakable than other movies with similar topics. It's far from a perfect movie for families and those who adore inspirational dramas, but regarding what's happening in the real world, I can also admit that we could all use the best day of our lives with this one. C |
Home of the most friendly movie reviews on the planet.
Categories
All
Follow Me |